It is possible I haven't communicated the gist of the idea.
systemd is functional. It does the things you say. It unifies things, including config files and log files. It works for you.
I just don't think the way it did this is that elegant.
My busybox analogy should be more viewed as: what if arch/ubuntu/rh decided that busybox would replace all coreutils, etc on their systems today? All the same commands. Still usable. But something is missing...
systemd is functional. It does the things you say. It unifies things, including config files and log files. It works for you.
I just don't think the way it did this is that elegant.
My busybox analogy should be more viewed as: what if arch/ubuntu/rh decided that busybox would replace all coreutils, etc on their systems today? All the same commands. Still usable. But something is missing...