Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

QUIC handles packet loss better. But I do not think there is any benefit from HTTP2.


Most significantly, QUIC handles packet loss in a way that is fair to all the contained streams; no head-of-line blocking.

But the parent asks

> Why do you need multiplexing when you are only downloading one (video) stream?

So that largely doesn't apply.


Yeah I was thinking the same thing – in some video contexts with some video codecs you may care more about latency and may be able to get a video codec that can cope with packet loss instead of requiring retransmission – except it seemed it wouldn’t apply too much to Netflix where the latency requirement is lower and so retransmission ought to be fine.

Maybe one advantage of HTTP/3 would be handling ip changes but I’m not sure this matters much because you can already resume downloads fine in HTTP/1.1 if the server supports range requests (which it very likely does for video)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: