Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's really an apples to kiwis comparison. The California project is certainly worth studying for how far off the rails it's gone, but the LV stuff is a toy project that's not really going to solve any real transportation problems long term.

Where it's really at in terms of learning how we could do better is to study places like Spain that are building the Madrid metro as well as long distance, high speed trains for relatively low prices. It's a thorny problem and it's not just "stuff costs less in Spain in general".

But what we'll get is more of this huckster selling us flashy stuff and not delivering, as well as California continuing to not deliver either.



> more of this huckster selling us flashy stuff and not delivering

But... the LVCC loop has literally been delivered? They are continuing to build it out and more stations will be opened in the very near future. You might want to take a step back and ask if bias is clouding your judgement at all.


Moving people around in automobiles underground is a fun Disney-esque ride, but not a serious transit system.


No True Scotsman.


If busses are from Glasgow and trains from Edinburgh, then that loop thing is indeed from Tahiti.

https://thenevadaindependent.com/article/teslas-in-tunnels-i...

https://san.com/cc/vegas-loop-faces-numerous-trespassers-and...

Think about the capacity of an automobile vs a bus or a subway with several cars.


I'm too busy thinking about the capacity of nothing at all, which is zero.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: