Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

While I agree with many of the points raised by the author, I guess I just had much much more pessimistic expectations than they did. If I were to write an article on the topic, I'd probably end up listing the exact same factual information, but with the opposite spin: "This is progressing much quicker and more smooth than I would have anticipated!"

Switching from passwords to passkeys is a big change in the entire security model of the modern user-facing internet. We shouldn't be at all surprised that people are both cautious and opinionated about how it should be done, how to migrate users, and how to deal with fallbacks.

Yes, the current situation is one that is messy and not significantly more secure than the previous status quo, but the direction of travel seems at least promising.

I wouldn't actually want my bank to overnight decide that passkeys are the way to log in, and if I use a passkey there should be no insecure fallback options. I want my bank to roll out a passkey, and figure out the infrastructure around it, probe for problems, and allow fallbacks that are equivalent to their previous systems. Similarly, I wouldn't want every passkey management implementation to instantly coalesce around one specific set of management practices and UX. I want various ideas to be tried out and see what comes out of it, even if some of those experiments are bad.



The article you would write is the right article! But it wouldn't get shared and make the first page of HN.

It's entirely possible people have written exactly the article you want, but our discovery mechanisms are all based on aggregate emotional reaction.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: