Implication not substantiated by random insignificant observation. Bot?

From the HM guidelines

> Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work.

I’m genuinely interested in why you think this particular post is ‘AI slop’.

Seems like it’s just because the author used the word delve which the use of has been linked to AI writing. Pretty flimsy evidence though, maybe the surgery really does like the word.

Thank you! I had no idea. By the way, the post definitely isn't AI—whether it's 'slop' is a matter of opinion, of course.

I see you’ve chosen not to reply to this question so FYI this article was not AI generated in any way.

Its possible to analyze documents or writings to determine if they written by the same person with a reasonable to good accuracy . Would be interesting to compare the suspect article against others by the same author. Unless Chat GPT has been told to write in the same style - not sure how that would work .....

not sure if its ChatGPT or not but the author uses "favourite" so I am going to assume it's more common in the UK or proper English country to be using the word.