The implication of the term is that there are other contexts for "male" or "fema... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		Qwertious 11 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: CDC: Unpublished manuscripts mentioning certain to... The implication of the term is that there are other contexts for "male" or "female" other than "biologically". If "non-woke" contexts assume that male/female are inherently biological terms, then "biologically [male/female" is obviously "woke".

pests 11 months ago | [–]

I don't see the implication. How is it obviously woke?

Qwertious 11 months ago | | [–]

It acknowledges trans people exist. And I put the word "woke" in quotes, because it's stupid and it's not my word.

technothrasher 11 months ago | [–]

Your second sentence is tautological, and also begging the question.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact