There is a strain of thinking evident in the article, and one I think is pervasive in corporate America today, which is that measurable savings are highlighted while difficult to quantify lost benefits are deemphasized.
When you can't precisely measure how much is lost by doing something half-assed, it's probably worthwhile to do it right.
When you can't precisely measure how much is lost by doing something half-assed, it's probably worthwhile to do it right.