I disagree with preventing the people from voting for who they want to vote for. Even if she had been convicted of cold-blooded murder, that should not override democracy.
> Even if she had been convicted of cold-blooded murder…
Setting aside the moral issues around murder, which give most humans at least a moment’s pause, wouldn’t it be awfully difficult to govern effectively from a prison cell?
The Le Pen family has been in every presidential elections since 1988 and never won once... she personally lost three of them and is nowhere close to win (~23% out of the 50+ needed)
Her party isn't outlawed so if people like their ideas they'll vote for them anyways.
I think that starting a trial in 2023 for conduct in the mid-2010s, after the defendant got second place in the 2022 presidential election, is quite strange timing. Perhaps I don't know enough about French law; is it common in France for trials to begin a decade after the investigation started?
Very common, Sarkozy (ex president) was on trial for illegal campaign financing. It happened in 2007, has been investigated since ~2010, the trial started in 2025 and finished a few days ago