Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is a perfect example of a motte and bailey. The "motte" is that people should be judged badly for parroting horrible ideas they heard (which makes sense) and the "bailey" is that people should be praised just for parroting nice things they heard (which doesn't make sense).


Upvote for practical and informative description of a logical fallacy, with extra love for motte and bailey.


Doesn't "motte and bailey" involve the same person taking the more extreme position followed by the more defensible position?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: