Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Eh, ICE journeys of similar distance seem to be in the same general price range.

> But the train still has to generate massive amounts of new traffic that doesn't currently exist to justify its huge costs.

There are apparently about 130 SF Bay Area to LA flights daily. Let's say on average 200 person planes, at 80% occupancy, so 20,000 people. The biggest high speed trains have a capacity on the order of 1300, though those are very long trains; 800 or less is more common. Assuming an 18 hour day, that's a train every 45 minutes or so. That seems... fine? You'd also expect some traffic to the intermediate destinations, and possibly some increase in travel because, really, it is so much less bloody awful than flying (anyone who tells you otherwise has either never been on an intercity train or never been on a plane).

One weird aspect of American exceptionalism is that it is not _just_ Americans saying "we're the best"; sometimes it is Americans saying "we can't have the nice things that all other large rich countries have because [whatever]". The US can manage a high speed rail line or two.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: