I once worked at a company that'd acquired a virtual-office company. I wasn't around for the acquisition, but it really smelled like one rich person bailing out another's failed investment (or someone on the board had a bunch of money in the acquisition target, or something along those lines).
To justify owning the useless damn thing, they insisted everyone use it, basically like Slack if it ate 3-4x the resources (really saying something, given Electron already eating 5-10x the resources it ought to need for any given task), monopolized a screen when in use, and added all the awkward elements of physical environments to virtual ones for no reason ("is it weird if 'I' 'sit' in this chair 'next to' this other 'person' when there are other chairs available in the room?", or "oh shit where's that meeting room 'physically' located, again? I think I'm lost...") while removing none of the awkwardness of virtual interactions.
Truly, bizarrely pointless. It was like some shit out of the Silicon Valley TV show, so absurd it was hard to believe it was real. I swear to god, I'm not making this up, they even had in-world presentations, so you could add all the fun of having a bad angle on a screen or being too far away to comfortably read the text to the joy of a Zoom screen-share. Totally nuts. Luckily you could also maximize whatever was being presented, but... hooray, your best feature is that I can ignore all the things that make your dumb crap distinctive? What a win.
This is what I think of every time I see anyone trying to promote Zuckerberg's weird, bad idea. I assure you, being in VR goggles would not have made the experience either more productive or more pleasant. Nobody who's ever tried to work like this even for one week could possibly think it's a good idea to invest in it.
To justify owning the useless damn thing, they insisted everyone use it, basically like Slack if it ate 3-4x the resources (really saying something, given Electron already eating 5-10x the resources it ought to need for any given task), monopolized a screen when in use, and added all the awkward elements of physical environments to virtual ones for no reason ("is it weird if 'I' 'sit' in this chair 'next to' this other 'person' when there are other chairs available in the room?", or "oh shit where's that meeting room 'physically' located, again? I think I'm lost...") while removing none of the awkwardness of virtual interactions.
Truly, bizarrely pointless. It was like some shit out of the Silicon Valley TV show, so absurd it was hard to believe it was real. I swear to god, I'm not making this up, they even had in-world presentations, so you could add all the fun of having a bad angle on a screen or being too far away to comfortably read the text to the joy of a Zoom screen-share. Totally nuts. Luckily you could also maximize whatever was being presented, but... hooray, your best feature is that I can ignore all the things that make your dumb crap distinctive? What a win.
This is what I think of every time I see anyone trying to promote Zuckerberg's weird, bad idea. I assure you, being in VR goggles would not have made the experience either more productive or more pleasant. Nobody who's ever tried to work like this even for one week could possibly think it's a good idea to invest in it.