Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The missing part is... those are Valentino's, those are not "Tennis shoes". Now, why did someone throw out those Valentino's? Because nobody who goes to college and wears Valentino would wear those Valentino's, those particular Valentino's pictured, to someone who likes Valentino: are garbage. To your second point, why not give them to someone with less? I would suspect that a young person who is attending Duke University, one of the most exclusive universities in the world, wearing Valentino, a luxury brand that even people who love luxury brands laugh at, gives oh about...mmm.. zero shits for someone who has less than them. Third, you referenced a society that has a sense of egalitarianism, I'd hazard: that society is far removed from the above realities.


You said the word "Valentino", which is meaningless, way too many times for it to be healthy.


It's not meaningless, people have whole PhDs in this stuff and it's a component of the concentration of social cultural anthropology.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valentino_(fashion_house)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valentino_(fashion_designer)

But within the houses system, Valentino sits somewhere specific. Hence I am being specific about The House of Valentino.

Valentino = Warhol.


Nobody wears Worhol's. Because there's no such thing. Because Warhol is not Valentino. And PhDs were written on even sillier stuff.


These things exist in this world: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artist

They're pretty cool, I recommend learning about them, personally, I did a whole degree on it...won 4 Emmy awards being one...silly me...


Artists are cool, fashion designers however are bane of this world because they help funnel insane amount of materials straight to a landfill.

Congrats on your Emmys. Not sure why your interests include something as mundane as shoes and arguing with opinionated idiot on the internet. You obviously have better things to think about.


using stereotypes about the rich is about as ignorant as making them about the poor.


Ignorant of what it's like to be poor, maybe. I don't believe my life experiences have resulted in me being ignorant to the rich, please buy some $DOCN.


you are making prejudicial comments, regardless of whether you experienced events that bolster your stereotype.


And if I've done expert level research into this very particular subject? Here is the ignorance: you know nothing about me.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: