I've been rethinking my personal knowledge management setup and realized my workflow is becoming AI-first. Most of my projects and ideas now start with a conversation in Claude/ChatGPT, but then I switch to Obsidian for structured notes. This creates friction - my thinking process is split across tools.
Do you "Add AI to a note taking app" or "Add structure to AI apps"?
I'm curious if others are thinking about this and how others are handling this.
The key insight: instead of 'AI + notes' or 'notes + AI', it's 'AI as part of your PKM system'. Sessions auto-save to your vault, perspectives can reference your existing notes, and everything stays in sync.
What makes this actually work: treating the perspectives (Weaver/Maker/Checker) like intelligent collaborators on your team, not command interfaces. When Checker raises objections, that's the system working - debate which ones matter. This collaborative approach transforms output quality.
The friction points reveal where the magic happens. If a perspective annoys you (usually Checker), that's your cue to engage deeper with its purpose rather than bypass it.
Still evolving based on what works, but it's been solving the exact split-brain problem you're describing.
[0] https://github.com/achamian/think-center