That's not what I said. Such intellectual dishonesty is an odd choice.
"It is a direct quote."
Of course the quote is a direct quote. The characterization is not. Again, I demand good faith and that's not what we have here. (I see that the response I just quoted has now been deleted--that's a step in the right direction.)
The programming language documentation wasn't written for an audience primarily composed of programmers? That would be an odd choice.