Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
mintplant
on Sept 4, 2012
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
AntiSec leaks 1,000,001 Apple UDIDs, Device Names/...
> It proves that the author of the rant is the leaker of the data, not just some guy linking to data someone else posted.
I don't see what would stop you from stating the password to a file you didn't upload.
nikatwork
on Sept 4, 2012
|
next
[–]
because you wouldn't know the password before the public announcement, and after the announcement it doesn't matter.
akennberg
on Sept 4, 2012
|
prev
|
next
[–]
That's why for these types of archives the password actually contains the credentials.
arn
on Sept 4, 2012
|
prev
[–]
true, but in this case the password contains "antis3c" [Antisec], the group that is responsible.
Groxx
on Sept 4, 2012
|
parent
[–]
So download it, decrypt it, and pick a different password. Takes a couple minutes, tops. And if your 'release' gets more attention than the original, how does the original prove that's what happened, or even get heard?
Devilboy
on Sept 4, 2012
|
root
|
parent
[–]
You can see who came first, the internet knows.
Groxx
on Sept 4, 2012
|
root
|
parent
[–]
The internet attributes much to the wrong sources. And forgets many redactions. I wouldn't trust such a thing to the internet.
Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch!
Applications
are open till November 2.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
I don't see what would stop you from stating the password to a file you didn't upload.