Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

At this point, it's obvious and clear that you can outwork these 996 companies by simply requiring employees work 7 days a week in the office.

What is preventing one of these 996 companies from doing that and taking the lead in their respective AI niche? If they really believe that an additional day is their competitive edge, that seems like a really easy moat to overcome for a competitor, and by that logic why stop there? Wouldn't you want to maximize your chances of success by requiring your employees work 7 days in the office?

Just have your employees work a full 7 days in the office. I'm not joking either. Would some CEO who has adopted this practice care to explain why they don't just make things simple and require their employees to report to the office 7 days per week? It's simple and will only select for the most hardcore of the hardcore. I'm actually surprised someone hasn't tried this yet.



I think it's about testing how far they can push before their workers push back.


Is that really the world you want to live in? If so, why?


why stop at 7?


Let's use Time Turners to work 8 days in a week.


"Take your amphetamines and be a Team Player, Bob"


The new trend is called 007.


Zero days off, zero breaks, 7 days a week.

The worst part is that you're going to have someone unironically come with this.


There will be a nonzero number of HN commenters who will sincerely and earnestly defend it, too. Not just playing devil's advocate.


Tagline: you can live after we exit

Completely unrelatedly, how are those family formation and birth rate statistics doing?


So, unemployed?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: