If you're at that point, the logical step would be to just support replying to t... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		Aransentin 4 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: WASM 3.0 Completed If you're at that point, the logical step would be to just support replying to the HTTP request with a "content-type: application/wasm" and skip the initial html step entirely.

apatheticonion 4 months ago [–]

I'm on this team 100%. It makes a lot of sense for a lot of use cases (where SEO doesn't matter).

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact