Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>To start with, randomly generated usernames weren't mentioned, and they are not a prerequisite.

I've seen sites randomly generate passwords for users as well. Does that mean users reusing their passwords at all is a prerequisite? Moreover if we're really accepting "whether average users or not, doesn't matter", I can also say that using emails doesn't decrease security because you can use randomized emails, as others have mentioned. At some point you have to constrain yourself to realistic threat models, otherwise the conversation gets mired in lawyering over increasingly implausible scenarios. For instance, by asking for emails at registration, you can more easily perform 2fa, whereas you can't do that with only a username/password combination[1].

[1] before you jump to say "but can ask for an email with username/password too!", keep in mind the original claim that username/password is better was in response to a comment asking "Why must apps require email?".



> I've seen sites randomly generate passwords for users as well. Does that mean users reusing their passwords at all is a prerequisite?

What?

> I can also say that using emails doesn't decrease security because you can[*] use randomized emails

That _doesn't_ _matter_. Viz:

> The only thing that matters is what they're doing—and whether what they're doing increases or decreases risk.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: