It was a straightforward critique of the article’s claims

Given the lack of denial to the straightforward question, you're probably safe in reading this as "yes it was indeed AI generated".

That does...answer tge question?

not an attempt to pass off anything as my own

then stop wasting peoples time with slop

if i wanted to read llm output i'd go dump it into chatgpt into myself

Your AI generated summaries have been repeatedly flagged by HN users. They do not add value to the discussion.

If only they were

If you think this comment was not written by the account holder or that account sales are occurring, please do as asked by the guidelines in such cases and contact the mods to report that, instead of posting about it in a discussion.

I wouldn't know if account sales was occurring, my first thought was that they sincerely wanted to have AI critique this article and post here. I don't think it is a good enough reason for me personally to flag.

I think if someone was trying to use AI to farm they wouldn't post these types of critiques, but something safer rather.

But I did wanted to see what their reasoning for posting those AI critiques was, and they answered, so I got my curiousity satisifed to an extent.

Moderators already told OP to stop and OP did not stop.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46179328

Irrelevant; “If you're worried about abuse, email [email protected] and we'll look at the data.” and especially “Don't feed egregious comments by replying; flag them instead.” both apply.

Thank you

So are we just disallowing multi-paragraph comments now?

If it's fully AI generated, perhaps add a disclaimer to it?

It is discouraged to post AI-generated comments to Hacker News, even if disclosed.

definitely reads like it... what is the point lol? Can you sell HN accounts or something?

The point was simply to analyse the argument on its merits

By word salad, ?