Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I forget why he’s a villain. Did he do something at Google?

He’s sort of a lesser known figure to me.



Eric Schmidt is, in his own words, an arms dealer now and is driving the R&D of autonomous A.I. weapons.


For the vast majority of non pacifists, that is not a bad thing.


> For the vast majority of non pacifists, that is not a bad thing.

Speak for yourself. I'm a non-pacifist, and I think "autonomous A.I. weapons" are a nightmare.


Sure, all lethal weapons are a horrific nightmare on some level.

But you also have to keep in mind that China, Russia and Hamas will gladly develop them anyway. Until we've figured out the worldwide peace thing, we need to keep running the race, awful as it is.


But AI weapons aren't horrific in some way common to "all lethal weapons." They have that and more.

AI weapons are specially horrific in the way they have potential put massive and specific lethal power under the total control of a small number of people, in a way (like all AI) that basically cuts most of humanity out of the future (or at the very least puts them under a boot where no escape is imaginable).

In some ways, they're even worse than nuclear weapons. A nuclear attack is an event, and if you survive there's some chance of escape. Station 100,000 fully automated drones around a city with orders to kill anything that moves, and the entire population will be dead in a couple months (anyone who tries to escape = dead, everyone else sees that and stays inside out of fear until they starve).

Manpower and attention limitations have been and important (and sometimes only) limit on the worst of humanity, and AI is poised to remove those limitations.


I think that's exaggerated.

But even if it's true, I don't see why letting China and Russia etc be the only ones having these weapons is good?


> I think that's exaggerated.

Honestly, I think the tech is probably getting pretty close to what I described. You don't need AGI or anything like it. Just autonomous surveillance drones watching for movement, and attack drones that can autonomously navigate to the area and hit the target (the latter is just stringing together a lot of drone tech I've seen implemented, e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzWIYOOKItM, https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/31/magazine/ukraine-ai-drone...).

> But even if it's true, I don't see why letting China and Russia etc be the only ones having these weapons is good?

That doesn't mean the tech isn't scary (a bad thing) or that I want SV people like Schmidt developing it. There's something weirdly misanthropic and unhinged about many in SV.


Apparently, none of them have seen any of the Terminator movies.


Maybe they wear two million sunblock?


I would go even further: Not only the vast majority, but 100% of non pacifist like AI weapons.


For the bottom 99.9% of wealthy people, it is not a good thing.


He was responsible for a bunch of the anticompetitive hiring agreements with Jobs at Apple and he’s a fairly well known lothario, but otherwise benign IMO considering his competition at that wealth level.


He is also the man who said ”If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place.” as if people are not being hunted for being LGBTQ even in the west, or persecutions of various kinds are a thing of the past, or spousal abuse doesn’t matter.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: