>> Do that enough and you won't know enough about your codebase to recognise errors in the LLM output.
> Okay, when that happens, then sure, you'll have a problem.
It's not exactly the same: how will you know that you are missing errors due to lack of knowledge?
> I now generate 90% of the code with LLM and I see no issues so far.
Well, that's my point, innit? "I see no errors" is exactly the same outcome from "missing the errors that are generated".
>> Do that enough and you won't know enough about your codebase to recognise errors in the LLM output.
> Okay, when that happens, then sure, you'll have a problem.
It's not exactly the same: how will you know that you are missing errors due to lack of knowledge?
> I now generate 90% of the code with LLM and I see no issues so far.
Well, that's my point, innit? "I see no errors" is exactly the same outcome from "missing the errors that are generated".