> I see this sentiment often, and I’m honestly not sure where this comes from, as it’s really not been my experience

If you see people saying it often, but you are convinced they are just feeling threatened, what AI generated software would point to to say, "Look at this! Definitive evidence that they are just coping!"

Well, for one thing, I’d point to all the other anecdotes of developers being made 10x more efficient due to LLM use.

But really I’m just comparing against my personal experience. Once I learned how to use the tools well, and what to expect (and what not to), I’ve found LLMs to be very powerful.

>If you see people saying it often, but you are convinced they are just feeling threatened, what AI generated software would point to to say, "Look at this! Definitive evidence that they are just coping!"

This is a trap. Anyone who answers this will see the goalposts being moved yet again.

95% of our code at a top in market global fintech is now written by agents. We make it write good code, and it does.

This is very vague. Maybe you could actually name the fintech (or, if that is too sensitive), you can list a few of its competitors?

GitHub

/s

I see your sentiment quite often here on HN¹, I'm honestly not sure what kind of experience you may have had with automatic program writers. LLM code absolutely sucks.

1 - I wonder why my other social circles are so different.

I am really curious about this because my experience is completely different. Can you elaborate a bit more on how you use LLM's for coding? Are you doing one-shot coding? Vibe coding (not looking at code)? Small focused one-step-at-a-time with yourself verifying? Anything else?

It's a common enough experience that it shouldn't be dismissed.

I think language, frameworks, domain and style can all influence the quality of the output. I think it’s hard to compare experiences.

I think a lot of the people saying AI code sucks is because the code isn't formatted the way they like, not because the code doesn't work.

Basically, the people that leave dozens of bikeshed code review comments.

Sure, sometimes I might ask the AI to break out a helper function or structure things differently, but that's the same as working with another dev

I've witnessed SQL executed with a where clause be wrapped in a function which then iterates over the result to re-enforce the where clause.

People need to read the slop they're throwing at reviewers.

It's a mistake to let AI write code unsupervised by a human. I tend to let it write code and then iterate on it. Sometimes myself (because explaining would take longer than actually doing it) sometimes I prompt the AI to improve specific points.

Have you seen how poor the Claude Code codename is?

If that's what the token providers themselves can get out of their SOTA models, imagine how bad it is for other companies.

I agree. Claude Code (for example) writes excellent code as long as the prompt is focused and clear.

Regarding 2

Isn't it possible that people who think LLMs are awesome at coding are in fact bad at it themselves, leading to them over estimating the LLMs "skill"?

To me it feels like people telling on themselves that they aren't very good

30+ years of experience here writing everything from JIT high-performance compilers to professional game engines to mission critical biz servers:

Claude Code is excellent at writing (C++) code. Especially multi-threading code. However I still need to verify everything because it will occasionally make mistakes.

Guess I'm the one who is delusional then

Oh well. Time to start building a new career before I'm completely irrelevant I guess

I don’t consider myself an expert, but I’ve been programming for the last 6 years, and of those 6 years I’ve spent almost all my spare time programming during this period except for a 1 year hiatus.

This includes personal projects with a decent amount of users, and 1 sold project. I’m not the best programmer, but I wouldn’t say I’m bad at all.

Question to you, have you actually used a leading model like Fable when it was available? I did. I was seriously impressed.

I’ll be honest I find it hard to take anyone seriously who says they can program better or faster than a model with those capabilities. That has not been my experience.

Architecting - yes people are still better overall. LLMs tend to go with the average middle of the road result. But in terms of output, raw speed, and getting something working? No way am I better than an llm.

Happy to be enlightened and told I’m completely wrong. Maybe I am an idiot. That is a possibility.

But how about I give you a task, and I give Claude that same task, and we compare results against execution speed? I’ll happily be the judge of that.

People are generally bad at judging themselves, and for some reason even worse about judging their agents' output.

I've heard a million people say their LLM workflow produces amazing code. But I have never actually seen the amazing code allegedly being produced. Where are the people saying "I love when my coworkers send me AI-generate PRs"?

“Amazing code”… who cares?

that’s like saying a book is only worth reading if each sentence is beautiful

To me I couldn’t care less as long as the overall story is coherent, and I care more about the idea density in the book.

Lord of the rings is a great book because of the ideas, not because Tolkien is the best writer ever.

Same with AI. I couldn’t care less if some of its code is crap, if it is dense with ideas and generally good execution. If it writes crap code sections I can “beautify” myself.

Plus LLMs are only going to improve… they have improved so much since ChatGPT 3. It’s insane.

And the arguments saying they haven’t can’t be taken in good faith

I mean sure. It can get stuff done faster

So can just copying from Stack Overflow, or taking from Open Source repos

There have always been reasons why we didn't prefer to do that in the past, but I guess laundering it through LLMs is fine. And that's just the tip of the ethical ice berg

High volumes of unvetted code is a bad practice. If the code winds up working out fine then congrats you won the slot machine. It's still a bad practice and very, very stupid to become reliant on

And by the way, I had been programming for longer than you have before I even graduated high school, if that matters

But we aren’t discussing ethics here, we are discussing technical capabilities.

Who said it’s unvetted?

Sure it matters