Why wouldn’t you include state spending? That’s the level of government primaril... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

rayiner 3 months ago | parent | context | favorite | on: AI boom risks global financial crash, warn central...

Why wouldn’t you include state spending? That’s the level of government primarily responsible for infrastructure and education.

ElProlactin 3 months ago [–]

I wasn't making a judgment about including or not including state spending. It's just that "US governments" is not a common way for Americans to describe federal and state. People think federal when they see "US government".

rayiner 3 months ago | [–]

Gotcha. Was being lazy and typing on my phone, sorry.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact