Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It makes sense for practice.
 help



Well, people don't play like computers, so this kind of practice can be useless.

How much of professional chess is metagaming the opponent vs. finding the best move from current game state?

From what pros are saying after matches, especially in classical chess, it's almost always preparation and metagaming the opponent vs finding good moves.

It's a lot of mind games involved, going for specific openings, repeating same moves as last match, doing a poor by surprising, move etc.

Many GMs said that to win a match you have to play non-ideal moves many times, otherwise it will likely end in a draw.


Magnus Carlson doesn't really need to practice chess (not in the same way most people do at least)



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: