Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
ChickeNES
40 days ago
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Unsealed Briefs in Authors’ Case v. Microsoft/Open...
If a machine can do the same work for nearly free, "but the existing people want to keep getting paid" is not an argument for copyright.
throwaway173738
40 days ago
|
next
[–]
Which is fine if you like human culture to never change for the next ten thousand years. LLMs can only ever interpolate or extrapolate things they’ve already been trained on.
ChickeNES
40 days ago
|
parent
|
next
[–]
I don’t accept the premise, it’s hard to take anyone seriously who is parroting the “stochastic parrot” argument in 02026.
throwaway173738
34 days ago
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
Your assertion that we’ll somehow get brand new human culture from something that isn’t human might be a little shaky too.
techpression
40 days ago
|
prev
[–]
It can’t, it needs hundreds of thousands (if not multiple millions) of human hours spent making content for it.
ChickeNES
40 days ago
|
parent
[–]
Training data? Luckily we have all of human history and culture to digitize to solve that problem.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: