The "anti-Israel" source post is literally a satellite map documenting Israel's razing of Rafah. It includes zero editorial, people's eyes can see for themselves what Israel is doing.

> but how come the source post is always blatantly anti Israel

I would like to know how would anyone give a positive spin to genocide and civilian displacement

> I would like to know how would anyone give a positive spin to genocide and civilian displacement

Well... what did Hamas expect after Oct 7th, other than the IDF riding into Gaza and cleaning shop for good?

As for the genocide claim... we're seeing average casualty and collateral damage reports for highly urban warfare. Hard to make a credible claim of genocide.

What did IDF expect after Oct 6th, other than Oct 7th?

IDF left Gaza in 2006.

Mango mango pineapple shoe, I can babble too.

> but how come the source post is always blatantly anti Israel?

Same reason blatantly anti Nazi sources have a higher chance of staying up compared to pro nazi sources. I'll let you process that one.

Yes, but also the source post is literally just a Google Map shot of the destruction of Rafah. It's primary evidence with zero editorial.