Doesn't that mean that the return type isn't actually fully specified? That sounds wild to me. How did they end up there?
https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/1522-conservative-impl-trai...
(OIBIT = auto trait, like Send/Sync)
- It would have been very annoying if it didn't work like this
- Auto-traits also leak through private fields, so you would have the same issue if you e.g. wrapped the concrete return type in a new type and returned that one instead.
Doesn't that mean that the return type isn't actually fully specified? That sounds wild to me. How did they end up there?