Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is what bugs me the most about this whole thing.

If the Tesla people on the phone with the reporter had just erred on the side of caution with their advice, the whole debacle would have been avoided.

Broder complaining about a couple of extra hours charging would have just come across as a nitpick.



Why should they? They were just reps on the phone talking to a guy who was reviewing superchargers, not planning for a media battle. I don't see how they would have prepared for anything other than the standard advice and it would be surprising if they did.


> I don't see how they would have prepared for anything other than the standard advice

The point is that their standard advice should err on the side of caution, not leave motorists stranded. Regardless of whether they work for the NYT.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: