It is unclear to me why you think a criticism of a bill at introduction should outweigh praise of the same bill at adoption. Do you understand how legislation is made? Have you heard of political process? Here is a refresher: someone proposes a bill, people debate it, changes are made and incorporated into the bill. This cycle repeats a few times (usually 3). Then a final vote is held. If the yeas overwhelm the nays, the bill passes. Otherwise, the bill fails.
After going through this process, C-11 (which was absolutely NOT a carbon copy of anything in its final form) passed. Michael Geist then wrote the piece I linked explaining why there were a lot of great provisions in bill C-11.
You sound like a teenager who has just learned to rebel against his parents' political views. The nickname "Harper & Goon Co." is not part of a reasonable discussion of Canadian politics. Your points don't make any sense.
After going through this process, C-11 (which was absolutely NOT a carbon copy of anything in its final form) passed. Michael Geist then wrote the piece I linked explaining why there were a lot of great provisions in bill C-11.
You sound like a teenager who has just learned to rebel against his parents' political views. The nickname "Harper & Goon Co." is not part of a reasonable discussion of Canadian politics. Your points don't make any sense.