I don't know. This seems to be the thrust of his arguments:
"By delegating information curation to multiple independent parties with demonstrated domain knowledge and critical ability, I ensure that what I read is not a mere reflection of what I believe."
Seems pretty reasonable to me.
Do you have any specific critique of "Abnormal Returns" and "The Big Picture," the curators he cites?
"By delegating information curation to multiple independent parties with demonstrated domain knowledge and critical ability, I ensure that what I read is not a mere reflection of what I believe."
Seems pretty reasonable to me.
Do you have any specific critique of "Abnormal Returns" and "The Big Picture," the curators he cites?