I use it, so it isn't nobody.

> not implemented by apps

It's implemented by the Android and iOS apps, which are the most used ones.

> actively discouraged by UI

How is this actively discouraging? https://img.gadgethacks.com/img/original/18/79/6363832577010...

>Telegram is more secure than mass market messengers like WhatsApp and Line

Why are you defending these fraudsters?

>I use it, so it isn't nobody.

Don't play silly word games, you just said "I would guess that usage is definitely below 1%"

>It's implemented by the Android and iOS apps, which are the most used ones.

Ah, so it'll only fail to work 30% of the time? That's not terrible UX at all.

>How is this actively discouraging?

Why do you have to press a button to chat securely, when the "less secure" WhatsApp does not require that? Is it because of Durovs superior encryption technology?

You simply can't justify that button.

Them being fraudsters doesn't make all of your allegations true.

> Don't play silly word games, you just said "I would guess that usage is definitely below 1%"

So? 0.1% is below 1% and would still correspend to ~200000 users. That is NOT nobody.

> Ah, so it'll only fail to work 30% of the time? That's not terrible UX at all.

Source for the 30%?

> Why do you have to press a button to chat securely, when the "less secure" WhatsApp does not require that?

It's a trade-off. WhatsApp / Telegram's secure-chats are lacking other features Telegram's non-secure chats have.